Correction: Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy

Authors

Julian Urrutia Interfaculty Initiative in Health Policy, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

Norman Daniels Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

Thalia Porteny Interfaculty Initiative in Health Policy, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

Abstract:

This article doesn't have abstract

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy

All societies face the need to make judgments about what interventions (both public health and personal medical) to provide to their populations under reasonable resource constraints. Their decisions should be informed by good evidence and arguments from health technology assessment (HTA). But if HTA restricts itself to evaluations of safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness, it risks being vie...

full text

correction: expanded hta: enhancing fairness and legitimacy

full text

Expanded HTA, Legitimacy and Independence; Comment on “Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy”

This brief commentary seeks to develop the analysis of Daniels, Porteny and Urrutia of the implications of expansion of the scope of health technology assessment (HTA) beyond issues of safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Drawing in particular on experience in the United Kingdom, it suggests that such expansion can be understood not only as a response to the problem of insufficiency of evi...

full text

Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy.

full text

expanded hta: enhancing fairness and legitimacy

all societies face the need to make judgments about what interventions (both public health and personal medical) to provide to their populations under reasonable resource constraints. their decisions should be informed by good evidence and arguments from health technology assessment (hta). but if hta restricts itself to evaluations of safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness, it risks being vie...

full text

HTA – Algorithm or Process?; Comment on “Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy”

Daniels, Porteny and Urrutia et al make a good case for the idea that that public decisions ought to be made not only “in the light of” evidence but also “on the basis of” budget impact, financial protection and equity. Health technology assessment (HTA) should, they say, be accordingly expanded to consider matters additional to safety and cost-effectiveness. They also complain that most HTA re...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}

Journal title

International Journal of Health Policy and Management

volume 5 issue 5

pages 347- 347

publication date 2016-05-01

unfollow

{@ msg @}

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Keywords

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com